Monday, 17 November 2014

Hooks Law Experiment

Hooke’s Law
The elasticity of different materials can be calculated using a formula called Hooke’s Law, the formula was discovered by a scientist named Robert Hooke in the 1600s. The basic definition of his Law is “it takes about twice as much force to stretch a spring twice as far”. This image shows the basic concept of Hooke’s Law in action.
 (Quote  & Image from Hyper Physics,http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/permot2.html#c3 )


Hooke’s basic equation is simply F=kx, F is the force acting down on the spring, in the case of my experiment this was represented by varying weights. K is the spring constant which is simply a number representing the elasticity of the spring itself, the elasticity of a material is determined by is actual material and the thickness of it. X just represents the distance that the spring has stretched when the force was applied.


The experiment that I performed was very easy but demonstrated Hooke’s Law perfectly. The experiment is conducted by hanging masses of different sizes on a spring hanging next to a ruler and just measuring how far the spring stretched. The masses used went from 1N up to 9N in increments of 1. This table shows the results of the experiment, y1 is the distance that the spring stretched and x is the masses.



x
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Y1
3
4.5
6
7.5
9
10.5
13
14
15



This is the graph (fig.1) that was given from the data which I plotted into excel, I used excel because it can give a much more accurate line of best fit than I can and that is important for the next calculation. The line with the red squares on it the relationship between x and y1, the line with blue diamonds is found using the equation y2=(a+0.5)x+c  the values for a and c are taken from the original y1 line.


The trend that is being depicted in the graph is that as the mass increases so does the extension which is good as that is what Hooke’s Law says should happen. The line of best fit is linear which shows that the changes are proportional to each other, I have displayed the equations of both the lines so you can see how I got the line y2 and to use in the next section.
The intersection of the two lines in the bottom corner of the graph using the scale on the graph I guessed the value of x to be slightly under 2.5. This shows the point where the two springs will be extended the same distance by the same weight. Using simultaneous equations I was able to get a much more accurate value.


Y2 =2.06583x+0.2

Y1=1.5593x=1.375

By putting the two equations equal to each other I could then solve to find x

2.06583x+0.2=1.5593x=1.375

0.5x=1.175

X=2.35

As you can see my value for x is pretty close to what I estimated to it be which means that the graphs are accurate.



I’m sure that you know that there is a point at which you stretch a spring so much that it will no longer return to its original form but stays in its extended form. When this happened we say that the spring has undergone plastic deformation, this means that you have deformed it so much that the molecular structure has undergone significant changes. When this occurs the force and the extension stop being linearly proportional and become exponential.





This is a graph demonstrating the relationship between force and extension, as you can see the blue diamond’s go up in a curve instead of a straight line, this is an exponential curve.

My conclusion for this experiment is that the findings have proven Hooke’s law to be true and showed the results to be true. As far as improvements go there are not many as excel was used to make sure the graph and equations were as accurate as they could be from the data. There was one data pint which you can see was slightly off the trend, the only thing I can attribute this to is either human error from me reading the ruler wrong or that the mass I used was not entirely accurate for some reason. The only other thing I would change to make this experiment more accurate would be to use a piece of equipment such as a laser distance measuring device to get even more accurate data to begin with. This is not needed particularly as my results were within an acceptable boundary.


I am aware of the requirements of good academic practice and the potential penalties for any breaches


Student No.  SW29G14